Onkologie. 2022:16(5):258-262 | DOI: 10.36290/xon.2022.049

Feasibility, dosimetric evaluation and early results of proton radiotherapy in the treatment of bilateral breast cancer

Alexandra Haas, Michal Andrlík, Sarah Falah Abass Alhamami, Andrea Pásztorová
Proton Therapy Center Czech, s. r. o., Praha

Primary synchronously detected bilateral breast cancer (PSBBC) is a relatively rare clinical entity. The adjuvant radiotherapy is a standard part of non-metastatic breast cancer treatment. Despite the fact that this treatment is irreplaceable, it bears the burden of side effects, which may lead to an unacceptable increase of cardiovascular risk and risk of developing secondary malignancy in some patients. Cardiovascular complications have been shown to reduce the survival in breast cancer patients, and therefore efforts should be made to reduce the dose to the heart and cardiac structure as much as possible. Due to its dosimetric advantages, proton radiotherapy offers the possibility to reduce dose to organs at risk while maintaining optimal target volume coverage. This advantage grows with increasing extent and severity of the target volume, among which the synchronously detected bilateral breast cancer clearly belongs. We retrospectively attempted to evaluate the feasibility and safety of using proton radiotherapy in the treatment strategy of synchronously detected bilateral breast cancer.

Keywords: PSBBC (primary synchronous bilateral breast cancer), proton therapy, cardiotoxicity.

Accepted: September 29, 2022; Published: September 29, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Haas A, Andrlík M, Abass Alhamami SF, Pásztorová A. Feasibility, dosimetric evaluation and early results of proton radiotherapy in the treatment of bilateral breast cancer. Onkologie. 2022;16(5):258-262. doi: 10.36290/xon.2022.049.
Download citation

References

  1. Kelmendi de Ustaran J, Meiss RP. Primary synchronous bilateral breast cancer: Epidemiological approach. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1988;12:311-14. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Padmanabhan N, Subramanyan A, Radhakrishna S. Synchronous Bilateral Breast Cancers. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015; 9(9):XC05-XC08. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Dawson PJ, Maloney T, Gimotty P, et al. Bilateral breast cancer: One disease or two? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1991;19:233-244. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Deo SV, Shridhar D, Purkayastha J, et al. Therapeutic controversies in bilateral breast cancer. Clin Oncol. 2003;15:297-298. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Tulusan AH, Ronay G, Egger H, et al. A contribution to the natural history of breast cancer. Bilateral primary breast cancer: Incidence, risks and diagnosis of simultaneous primary cancer in the opposite breast. Arch Gynecol. 1985;237:85-91. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Chandrika, Permi HS, Kishan Prasad HL, et al. Synchronous bilateral medullary carcinoma of breast: Is it metastasis or second primary. J Cancer Res Ther. 2012;8(1):129-131. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.95193. PMID: 22531532. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Ozturk A, Alco G, Sarsenov D, et al. Synchronous and metachronous bilateral breast cancer: A long-term experience. J Buon. 2018;23(6):1591-1600. Go to PubMed...
  8. Kheirelseid EA, Jumustafa H, Miller N, et al. Bilateral breast cancer: analysis of incidence, outcome, survival and disease characteristics. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;126(1):131-140. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Lewis TR, Casey J, Buerk CA, et al. Incidence of lobular carcinoma in bilateral breast cancer. Am J Surg. 1982;144(6):635-638. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Mejdahl MK, Wohlfahrt J, Holm M, et al. Synchronous bilateral breast cancer: a nationwide study on histopathology and etiology. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020;182(1):229-238. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Muratori L, Giacomelli L, Brescia A, et al. Il carcinoma bilaterale della mammella: trattamento e profilassi. Revisione della letteratura [Bilateral carcinoma of the breast: treatment and prevention, Review of the literature]. Ann Ital Chir. 1993;64(5):489-493; discussion 493-494. Go to PubMed...
  12. Mose S, Adamietz I, Thilmann Ch, et al. Bilateral Breast Carcinoma Versus Unilateral Disease, American Journal of Clinical Oncology. December 1997;20(6):541-545. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Heron DE, Komarnicky LT, Hyslop T, et al. Bilateral breast carcinoma: risk factors and outcomes for patients with synchronous and metachronous disease. Cancer. 2000;88(12):2739-2750. Go to original source...
  14. Darby S, Ewertz M, McGale P, et al. Risk of ischemic heart disease in women after radiotherapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:987-998. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Shilkrut M, Belkacemi Y, Kuten A. Secondary malignancies in survivors of breast cancer: how to overcome the risk. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2012;84:e86-89. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Lee MS, Finch W, Mahmud E. Cardiovascular complications of radiotherapy. Am J Cardiol. 2013;112:1688-1696. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Fan LL, Luo YK, Xu JH, et al. A dosimetry study precisely outlining the heart substructure of left breast cancer patients using intensity-modulated radiation therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014;15:4624. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Taylor CW, Nisbet A, Mcgale P, et al. Cardiac exposures in breast cancer radiotherapy: 1950s-1990s. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phy. 2007;69:1484-1495. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Correa CR, Das IJ, Litt HI, et al. Association between tangential beam treatment parameters and cardiac abnormalities after definitive radiation treatment for left-sided breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;72:508-516. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Nilsson G, Holmberg L, Garmo H, et al. Distribution of coronary artery stenosis after radiation for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:380-386. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Gagliardi G, Constine LS, Moiseenko V, et al. Radiation dose-volume effects in the heart. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(3 Suppl):S77-85. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Edvardsson A, Nordström F, Ceberg C, et al. Motion induced interplay effects for VMAT radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63(8):085012. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Rana S, Rosenfeld AB. Investigating volumetric repainting to mitigate interplay effect on 4D robustly optimized lung cancer plans in pencil beam scanning proton therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021;22(3):107-118. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. RTOG. Breast Cancer Atlas for Radiation Therapy Planning: Consensus Definitions. 2017.
  25. Sun T, Lin X, Tong Y, et al. Heart and Cardiac Substructure Dose Sparing in Synchronous Bilateral Breast Radiotherapy: A Dosimetric Study of Proton and Photon Radiation Therapy. Front Oncol. 2020;9:1456. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Cheng HW, Chang CC, Shiau AC, et al. Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and field-in-field technique for synchronous bilateral breast cancer. Med Dosim. 2020;45(3):271-277. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. McKenzie E, Razvi Y, Bosnic S, et al. Dosimetry and outcomes in patients receiving radiotherapy for synchronous bilateral breast cancers. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2021;52(4):527-543. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Ntentas G, Dedeckova K, Andrlik M, et al. Clinical Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma: Which Patients Benefit the Most? Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019;9(3):179-187. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Oncology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.