Onkologie. 2021:15(3):112-114 | DOI: 10.36290/xon.2021.020

The role of robotic surgery in the management of early cervical cancer

Richard Feranec, Gabriel Jelenek, Josef Chovanec
Oddělení gynekologické onkologie, Klinika operační onkologie MOÚ a LF MU a Masarykův onkologický ústav v Brně

This study aims to present the review of published data on the current role of the mini-invasive, especially robotic surgical approach in early cervical cancer treatment. The paper is focused on the oncological safety of robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy comparing to open radical procedure. We determine conclusions for current clinical practice from the results of recent studies.

Keywords: cervical cancer, radical hysterectomy, robotic surgery.

Published: May 6, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Feranec R, Jelenek G, Chovanec J. The role of robotic surgery in the management of early cervical cancer. Onkologie. 2021;15(3):112-114. doi: 10.36290/xon.2021.020.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2017; (67): 7-30. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. UZIS ČR, NOR ČR 2016, Novotvary 2016, Cancer Incidence 2016 in the Czech Republic, https://www.uzis.cz/sites/default/files/knihovna/novotvary2016.pdf.
    3. Nezhat CR, Burrell MO, Nezhat FR, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with paraaortic and pelvic node dissection. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol 1992; 166: 864-865. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    4. Spirtos, NM, Eisenkop SM, Schlaerth JB, Ballon SC. Laparoscopic radical http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1040-8428(18)30211-7/sbref0015hysterectomy (type III) with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage I cervical cancer: surgical morbidity and intermediate follow-up. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol 2002; 187(2): 340-348. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Raspagliesi F, Bogani G, Spinillo A. Introducing nerve-sparing approach during minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for locally-advanced cervical cancer: a multi-institutional experience. Eur J Surg Oncol 2017; 43: 2150-2156. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. Seamon LG, Fowler JM, Richardson DL, et al. A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 114(2): 162-167. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.04.017. Epub 2009 May 9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Shazly SAM, Murad MH, Dowdy SC, et al. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2015; 138: 457-471. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. Wang YZ, Deng L, Xu HC, et al. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage cervical cancer. BMC Cancer 2015; 15. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    9. Sert BM, Boggess JF, Ahmad S, et al. Robot-assisted versus open radical hysterectomy: a multi-institutional experience for early-stage cervical cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016; 42: 513-522. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    10. Bogani G, Cromi A, Uccella S, et al. Laparoscopic versus open abdominal management of cervical cancer: long-term results from a propensity-matched analysis. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2014; 21: 857-862. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. Wallin E, Flöter Rådestad A, Falconer H. Introduction of robotassisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: impact on complications, costs and oncologic outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2017; 96: 536-542. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Jin YM, Liu SS, Chen J, Chen YN, Ren CC. Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0193033. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    13. Zanagnolo V, Minig L, Rollo D, Tomaselli T, Aletti G, Bocciolone L, et al. Clinical and oncologic outcomes of robotic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer: experience at a referral cancer center. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2016; 26: 568-574. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    14. Shah CA, Beck T, Liao JB, Giannakopoulos NV, Veljovich D, Paley P. Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer. J Gynecol Oncol 2017; 28: e82. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    15. Gortchev GT, Tomov S, Tantchev L, Velkova A, Radionova Z. Robot-assisted radical hysterectomy- perioperative and survival outcomes in patients with cervical cancer compared to laparoscopic and open radical surgery. Gynecol Surg 2012; 9: 81-88. Go to original source...
    16. Lim PC, Kang E, Park DH. A comparative detail analysis of the learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in treatment of endometrial cancer: a casematched controlled study of the first one hundred twenty two patients. Gynecol Oncol 2011; 120: 413-418. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    17. Rauh-Hain JA. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive staging surgery in women with early stage cervical cancer. Proceedings of the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists, Mar 2018.
    18. Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, et al. Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 1895-1904. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    19. Kimmig R. Minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer: consequences for treatment after LACC Study. J Gynecol Oncol. 2018; 29(4): e75 https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e75 pISSN 2005-0380*eISSN 2005-0399. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    20. Falconer H, et al. Robot-assisted approach to cervical cancer (RACC): an international multi-center, openlabel randomized controlled trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019; 29:1072-1076. doi:10.1136/ijgc-2019-000558. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    21. Chiva L, et al. SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020; 30(9): 1269-1277. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001506. Epub 2020 Aug 11. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

    Return to the content


    Oncology

    Madam, Sir,
    please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
    Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

    I declare:

    1. that I have met the above instruction
    2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited

    No
    Yes

    If your statement is not true, please be aware
    that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.