Onkologie. 2012:6(2):79-82

New options of expensive pneumo-oncological therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) in the

Jana Skřičková
Klinika nemocí plicních a tuberkulózy LF MU a FN Brno Bohunice

first line based on morphological and molecular genetic diagnosis in the Czech Republic

Current diagnosis of non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) cannot rest merely on the determination that it is NSCLC without providing

any further specification. Accurate morphological classification of NSCLC and classification into individual subtypes (adenocarcinoma,

large-cell carcinoma, squamous-cell carcinoma…) as well as genetic testing are all required. When the morphological and molecular

genetic diagnosis has been accurately established, patients with NSCLC can receive agents whose efficacy, while meeting certain criteria,

offers a chance of improved survival. They include both drugs from the cytostatic group and those for biologically targeted therapy. The

paper deals with those agents for which the amount of reimbursement for the first-line treatment of NSCLC has been determined in the

Czech Republic. They are bevacizumab, pemetrexed and gefitinib.

Keywords: non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), diagnosis, treatment of advanced NSCLC, biological therapy, pemetrexed

Published: April 23, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Skřičková J. New options of expensive pneumo-oncological therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) in the. Onkologie. 2012;6(2):79-82.
Download citation

References

  1. http://www.svod.cz.
  2. Ginsberg RJ. Lung Cancer. London: BC Decker Hamilton; 2002.
  3. Hirsch FR, Spreafico A, Novello S, et al. The prognostic and predictive role of histology in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2008; 3: 1468-81. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Sculier J Pand Moro-Sibilot D. First-and second-line therapy for advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer, Eur Respir J 2009; 33: 915-930. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Manegold C, von Pawel J, Zatloukal P, et al. Randomized, double-blind multicentre Phase III study of bevacizumab in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine in chemotherapy-na?ve patients with advanced or recurrent non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): BO17704. J Clin Oncol 2007 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings Part I. 25 (18S) (2007) (Abstract LBA7514). Go to original source...
  6. Scagliotti GV, Park K, Patil S, Rolski J, Goksel T, Martins R, Gans SJM, Visseren-Grul C Peterson. Survival without toxicity for cisplatin plus pemetrexed versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine in chemonaive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A risk-benefit analysis of a large phase III study. European Journal of Cancer 2009; 45(13): 2298-2303. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Mok T, Wu YL, Thongprasert S, et al. Phase III, randomised, open/label, first-line study of gefitinib vs carboplatin/ paclitaxel in clinically selected patients with advanced nonsmall-slee lung cancer (IPASS). Ann Oncol 2008; 19(Suppl. 8) LBA2.
  8. Pešek M, Skřičková J, Kolek V, a kol. Výsledky klinického hodnocení účinnosti a toxicity gefitinibu v rámci programu časného přístupu u nemalobuněčného karcinomu plic v České republice. Stud Pneumol. Phtiseol 2009; 69: 62-68.
  9. Skřičková J, Pešek M, Zatloukal P, Kolek V, Koubková L, Salajka F, Štícha M, Tomíšková M, Kadlec B. Erlotinib in patients with advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Results on 973 patients from Tarceva Register of Czech Republic. Journal of Thoracic Oncology 2010; 5(Suppl. 1): S88-S89.




Oncology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.